| File No. 54 |
| I SAMUEL 13:1 — 14:23 |
| SAUL DISOBEYS
THE LORD / JONATHAN’S DARING DEED
Printable
Version  |
| (SBS Bk 2 Story NoS. 31 & 32) |
| Story Notes |
| Saul now had a standing army of 3000
rather than the citizen militia that had sufficed before.
However, his own tribal area remained under Philistine
control and his kingship could not be affirmed without
decisive action. This action came from his son rather
than himself. As we see later, Jonathan was a man of faith,
and so, of action. Saul seemed more ruled by his uncertainties
than by God’s call. The dilemma caused by mounting opposition
and timid troops could be likened to the situation King
Ahaz experienced later. Isaiah said to him: ‘If you will
not believe, surely you shall not be established’ (Isa. 7:9). |
| The terms of God’s call to Saul included
waiting for Samuel to offer sacrifice before battle. The
point was critical because a kingship with a life of its
own, not tied to the word of the Lord, would undermine
Israel as a theocracy. Saul’s reasoning about waiting
seven days seems reasonable but he admitted that he ‘forced’
himself. Offering sacrifice does not seem to have been
the problem (cf. 14:34–35; II Sam. 24:25; I Kings 3:15)
so much as disregarding the prophet. His thinking had
become clouded with self-reliance. God made it clear that
no dynasty would arise from this man. |
| Later on, David
(II Sam. 24:10) and Asa (II Chron. 16:9) also acted foolishly
(the word implies mental incapacity and self-reliance)
in disregarding a prophetic command and they suffered
severely. |
| When Saul was chosen by God he was
chosen for the people (8:18), but God would appoint another
king ‘for himself’ (13:14). The appointment would arise
from God’s own heart rather than out of the heart of the
people. In this way, we are introduced to David who will
occupy much of the latter part of the book. Saul would
now have to live in the shadow of the one the Lord had
in mind as his replacement. |
| Even still, Saul could have been like
his father, a mighty man of valour (9:1), and remember
Gideon whom God called a mighty man of valour (Jud. 6:12).
Though the country was almost stripped of weapons and
Saul had only 600 of his earlier 3000 men, victory could
have been his. But it was his son Jonathan who showed
what it meant to live under the kingship of God. ‘Nothing
can hinder the LORD from saving by many or by few’, he
said. |
| Saul was informed that the Philistines
had retreated, found that his son was missing (did Saul
guess that he had caused the retreat?) but lacked confidence
to act and called for the ark to get a further word from
the Lord. Then he dispensed with this when he saw that
the confusion among the Philistines was increasing. With
troops regathered from defectors and the frightened, God
gave Israel a great victory that day. |
| © Grant Thorpe 2000 |
| |